<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:52:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Coding</category><category>Visual Studio</category><category>geek</category><category>tools</category><category>blog</category><category>Programming</category><category>.NET</category><title>Destination IUnknown</title><description>Mostly on .NET, Java, Blogosphere, software development and techie stuff by Victor Hadianto</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>16</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-7794018426949562136</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-07-26T15:41:50.886+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tools</category><title>Tools: Notepad++</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_VXsqepBnd3Y/TEl6jMXB8EI/AAAAAAAADkM/ELYAe15_ZWA/s1600/notepad%2B%2B.png"&gt;&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 287px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_VXsqepBnd3Y/TEl6jMXB8EI/AAAAAAAADkM/ELYAe15_ZWA/s320/notepad%2B%2B.png" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5497059565214232642" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Looking for a real Notepad? There are some alternative, but my choice is &lt;a href="http://notepad-plus-plus.org/"&gt;Notepad++&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;It's free, open source, very fast and most importantly just works.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;One of the most useful features is being able to change the content type at run time.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is particularly important when opening *.config file from .NET solution, or any other data file that you know is of a certain type but it has different extension.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-7794018426949562136?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2010/07/tools-notepad.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_VXsqepBnd3Y/TEl6jMXB8EI/AAAAAAAADkM/ELYAe15_ZWA/s72-c/notepad%2B%2B.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-7280085524943930508</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-07-14T15:33:29.907+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tools</category><title>Tools: WinToFlash</title><description>&lt;div&gt;The DVD drive on my notebook had its day. No biggie since I don't really use it, but I now have problems for re-install.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://wintoflash.com/home/en/"&gt;WinToFlash&lt;/a&gt; looks promising, but haven't tried it yet. If it works, it'll save me £30 - £50 buying an external drive to re-install Windows.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-7280085524943930508?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2010/07/tools-wintoflash.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-4766811161964218561</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-07-13T11:16:10.867+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tools</category><title>Tools: Agent Ransack</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.mythicsoft.com/page.aspx?type=agentransack&amp;amp;page=home"&gt;Agent Ransack&lt;/a&gt; is a nifty little file search utility. It's leap and bounds better than the bog standard Windows Search (in XP at least, haven't used Windows 7 yet). It's fast and lightweight.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;You can search the content of the file or use regular expression. It's great and I can't live without it (at work at least).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-4766811161964218561?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2010/07/tools-agent-ransack.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-1756670375327086605</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-07-12T11:43:07.042+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tools</category><title>Tools: Snippy</title><description>A colleague just showed me a really good screen shot tools, with a human aspect on it, Snippy:&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bhelpuri.net/Snippy/"&gt;http://www.bhelpuri.net/Snippy/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Well worth the download.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;But one worth of caution, Snippy hooks into your F11, so if you're wondering why that Debug doesn't go into the method you know why!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-1756670375327086605?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2010/07/tools-snippy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-2762101725478670507</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-04-05T22:18:58.282+01:00</atom:updated><title>Blogger FTP Migration</title><description>Blogger is shutting down their FTP publishing. Fortunately they provided us with a rather simple migration tool and even created a dedicated &lt;a href="http://blogger-ftp.blogspot.com/"&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; for this.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The migration path is painless (at least for me) and it works pretty much straight away with little problem. I am a happy camper and in my opinion my blog now has a better address compared to the old scheme.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Only comment is that I think the migration timetable is rather short from the time of the migration path released to the end of FTP publishing. Having said that I think this is due to Blogger trying to close this project as soon as they can.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;All in all I think the migration tool works and works very well and the move to FTP publishing to Blogger's hosted blog is better since it seems that their web server is much faster than my free GoDaddy's one :)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-2762101725478670507?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2010/04/blogger-ftp-migration.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-8720028581817347342</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-04-05T20:51:31.307+01:00</atom:updated><title>This blog has moved</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;       This blog is now located at http://iunknown.hadianto.net/.&lt;br /&gt;       You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click &lt;a href='http://iunknown.hadianto.net/'&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;       For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to&lt;br /&gt;       http://iunknown.hadianto.net/feeds/posts/default.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-8720028581817347342?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2010/04/this-blog-has-moved.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-2801642775830728479</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-31T21:05:04.751+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>.NET</category><title>Referencing assemblies in GAC</title><description>I found out that you can't actually refer to assemblies from the GAC directly. So in development, you need to add reference to the physical assemblies (wherever that assemblies are located), set "Copy Local" to false and at run time, the CLS will load the assembly reference from the GAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More information here:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eggheadcafe.com/PrintSearchContent.asp?LINKID=1175"&gt;http://www.eggheadcafe.com/PrintSearchContent.asp?LINKID=1175&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/demystifygac.aspx"&gt;http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/demystifygac.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-2801642775830728479?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2009/03/referencing-assemblies-in-gac.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-8367560264143222007</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-03T20:12:00.618Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Programming</category><title>Running DOS batch file from UNC path</title><description>My DOS batch install file broke when I tried running them from a UNC path. It says: "CMD does not support UNC paths as current directories". Old error message but new to me. Make sense since DOS was around before the UNC path era.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Turn out that there is a &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/whaggard/archive/2005/01/28/get-directory-path-of-an-executing-batch-file.aspx"&gt;solution&lt;/a&gt;, not the cleanest but it works. Basically you have to do this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;pushd "%~dp0"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;REM ... do your stuff&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;popd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What pushd does is automatically map the given parameter as a drive and popd removes the mapping. Not the best solution, but a working one. And the "%~dp0" parameter gets you the current directory of the batch file.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-8367560264143222007?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2009/03/running-dos-batch-file-from-unc-path.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>5</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-9007628177248657210</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-28T18:01:32.229Z</atom:updated><title>SkyDrive bumped to 25Gb</title><description>&lt;a href="http://skydrive.live.com/"&gt;Microsoft SkyDrive&lt;/a&gt; ramps its storage space to 25Gb. This will undoubtedly heating up the competition for online backup services.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think 25Gb is plenty for a lot of people. I for one will be in those category. What it's missing is sync ability ala &lt;a href="http://www.carbonite.com/"&gt;Carbonite.&lt;/a&gt; There's a &lt;a href="http://www.gladinet.com/"&gt;Gladinet&lt;/a&gt;, a new software to mount web-drive to your Windows Explorer but it's still in Beta and that too is missing sync ability.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;For me though, this is great news. I will start uploading my archived files one-by-one while giving me a bit more time to do my research for online backup or when Gladinet finally comes out with the sync function or when GDrive is finally released ... whenever that may be.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-9007628177248657210?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2009/02/skydrive-bumped-to-25gb.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-830603369187222097</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-03T16:38:57.799Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>.NET</category><title>Is that Padding or Margin?</title><description>I've always got confused about the difference between Padding and Margin. Yeah sure for a seasoned web developers or UI developers this is easy, but I hardly touch any UI code these days (that may change).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dan Rigsby has this really good post about the &lt;a href="http://www.danrigsby.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/20/margins-and-padding-in-wpf/"&gt;difference between Padding and Margin &lt;/a&gt;(in WPF), bookmarked and linked.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-830603369187222097?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2009/02/is-that-padding-or-margin.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-6084404919279336428</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-05T11:02:40.197Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>.NET</category><title>Hashtable Serialization</title><description>I've experienced the pain of Hashtable serialization/deserialization. It's just doesn't work as you expect it to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The following two posts are very useful explaining what the issues with Hashtable's serialization mechanism:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/279524/hashtable-ondeserialization"&gt;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/279524/hashtable-ondeserialization&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.blogger.com/%20http://clevercoder.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/hashtable-serialization-and-the-ideserializationcallback-interface/"&gt;http://clevercoder.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/hashtable-serialization-and-the-ideserializationcallback-interface/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-6084404919279336428?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2009/02/hashtable-serialization.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-5794178400496995039</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-21T17:30:01.142Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>blog</category><title>Good Bye Hostway, Hello GoDaddy</title><description>I can't find any fault with my previous hosting provider, &lt;a href="http://www.hostway.com/"&gt;Hostway&lt;/a&gt;, but 'tis is the time to reduce spending and be prudent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So since I hardly ever use any of the features provided by Hostway, I've decided to go cheap and use GoDaddy's ads supported free hosting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've been slowly moving away from the "do it yourself" mantra and moving to the "let others do it" mantra. How things have changed :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No longer have the time or passion to tinker with MovableType, I now use Blogger to manage the (pretty much abandoned) blogs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://coppermine-gallery.net/"&gt;Coppermine&lt;/a&gt; is gone a while back, I just could not be arsed to maintain it anymore. Now all my pics are hosted in &lt;a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/vhadiant"&gt;Picasa&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just a few years ago I loved to tinker with MT, WordPress or Coppermine. Thus being able to ssh to my web host is very important, but now that I've pretty much outsourced all the functionalities, a free web host with GoDaddy is more than enough. And of course it's free.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-5794178400496995039?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2009/01/good-bye-hostway-hello-godaddy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-9199117021075471162</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-27T13:18:08.468+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>.NET</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Visual Studio</category><title>Manually creating Interop dll using tlbimp.exe</title><description>Visual Studio .Net automatically creates Interop dll when you reference the COM dll in your project. This is all nice and behaves as expected, but at times you may want to create the Interop dll manually.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tlbimp.exe is the tool to use. However, strange as it may seems, by default it doesn't do what Visual Studio does. How interesting ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Visual Studio .Net by default add "Interop." at the beginning of the generated Interop dll and set the namespace as the name of the dll &lt;em&gt;sans&lt;/em&gt; the ".dll".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example, if the dll is called MyCOM.dll. Visual Studio generates: Interop.MyCOM.dll and creates the Interop dll under MyCOM namespace.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To achieve the same effect using tlbimp, you need to use both the /out and /namespace flag. For example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;tlbimp /out:Interop.MyCOM.dll /namespace:MyCOM MyCOM.dll&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sorted.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-9199117021075471162?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2008/06/manually-creating-interop-dll-using.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-4878242988493500135</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-25T16:09:34.206+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Coding</category><title>Resharper Love &amp; Hate</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/"&gt;ReSharper&lt;/a&gt; is the tool that I can't live without it and I can't live with it. It's easy to say why. First of all I just can't work without the following R# shortcuts:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Ctrl + N (this probably worth 95% of R# price)&lt;br /&gt;- Ctrl + B&lt;br /&gt;- Ctrl + Shift + B&lt;br /&gt;- Alt + F7&lt;br /&gt;- Ctrl + Shift + F7&lt;br /&gt;- Ctrl + F12&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the code analysis is too darn useful:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Auto import&lt;br /&gt;- Auto initialise variable through constructor&lt;br /&gt;- Generate getter&lt;br /&gt;- Plus all the refactoring tools (extract method etc. etc. etc.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it's really s ..... l .... o .... w. It's worse during debugging session. Every F10 can take up to a second. Evaluating a variable can produce a time-out and it also crashes my debugging session when it's running within NUnit. God knows why.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's such a shame for such a great tool to be super slow. I often had to turn R# off for debugging and turn it back on during coding. The problem with this is that it often screw up the R# keyboard short cuts and I had to reset it again. This takes about 25 minutes in my PC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A lot of people complained about R# regarding its memory foot print and more frequently ... performance. This seems to be a common whinge about it. If only R# is a tad faster, we all will be in coding nirvana. I kid you not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the mean time I'm investigating CodeRush + Refactor combo as R# replacement.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-4878242988493500135?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2008/06/resharper-love-hate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-6348903209591617451</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-06T10:49:47.272Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Programming</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>.NET</category><title>LoaderLock was detected</title><description>Blimey … what was that? This kind of exception, that only happens during debugging, confuses developers. Googling about the problem shows that Microsoft at times gives &lt;a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/f842bea28f03f2de/b402b0bc20fede1a"&gt;pointless&lt;/a&gt; answer. Some blame iTunes about this problem ;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rather than following the advice to turn this rather useful check in VS 2005, the most &lt;a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/4efb2443848c4e65/a7c0cb9fac34f768"&gt;probable causes&lt;/a&gt; of this problem are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) An unmanaged dll calls a managed dll on its DLLMain or&lt;br /&gt;2) Not marshalling your call back to the main UI thread.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vivek wrote a bit more about this problem &lt;a href="http://vivekthangaswamy.blogspot.com/2006/11/loaderlock-was-detected-error-when.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-6348903209591617451?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2008/03/loaderlock-was-detected.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7564822384159984078.post-6770807438670621755</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-20T22:45:01.049Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>blog</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>geek</category><title>New Home</title><description>Well here it is. After years of mucking around with &lt;a href="http://www.movabletype.org/"&gt;Movable Type&lt;/a&gt;, I've made up my mind that it ain't worth it anymore. Started as curiosity about running my own blogging engine, it's becoming more and more obvious that I just don't have the energy nor time to maintain it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I had this grand idea of having a cool CMS, blogging and online photo library system all on my website. However, just like the guys at Top Gear always say: it was ambitious but rubbish! The Movable Type is now several version old, I never get around to install the CMS and the Coppermine is neglected. Running all these things give me more hassle than I can tolerate. So off with all of them!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.e-gineer.com/"&gt;Nathan&lt;/a&gt; has the right idea of having Blogger as your main blog engine and publish them via FTP to your webserver. This way you still have all the HTML files on your site while relieving all the boring engine maintenance to Blogger. Owned by Google, I'm sure they won't disappear anytime soon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm taking his advice and ditching Movable Type. In fact I'm going to ditch &lt;a href="http://coppermine-gallery.net/"&gt;Coppermine&lt;/a&gt; install too. That is my failed online photo library attempt and will move my online photos to a &lt;a href="http://vhadiant.sharpcast.com/"&gt;managed solution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't get me wrong, Movable Type and Coppermine are an excellent software. I just don't have the interest of playing with them anymore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So here it is the new location for Destination IUnknown.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7564822384159984078-6770807438670621755?l=iunknown.hadianto.net' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://iunknown.hadianto.net/2008/02/migrating-custom-movable-type-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (vhadiant)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>
